Weblog

Friday, 29 February 2008

  • What kind of man was he?

    When I was growing up and we heard the stories of Jacob getting the birthright and blessing I perceived Jacob as a big deceptive jerk.  But I didn't flesh out his character more than that.  Elie Wiesel portrays Jacob in a manner that at first seemed entirely contrary to my idea of him, but as I have considered it, it seems to make sense.  He shows Jacob to be shy and insecure, a man who acts out to determine who he is.

    As a boy, Jacob is not paid much attention by his father.  His twin is a man’s man and gets all the paternal love.  Jacob is the baby of the family and encouraged to stick close to his mother. When Esau asks for food, Jacob immediately seizes the opportunity to take his birthright.  We can’t know if this was planned or a spur of the moment idea, but I do wonder if Jacob grasped this opportunity because he felt shafted by life. He wasn’t born years after Esau, but only a few moments.  Yet those moments meant that his twin got everything and he got nothing.  I begin to feel a bit more sympathetic to Jacob.  It is an interesting exercise to round out the subtleties of a biblical character. You can end up with a very different perspective on their actions than you had before.

    Another thing: When Rebekah was pregnant, she was told that the older would serve the younger.  Did her prodding of Jacob and conditioning him to usurp serve as the primary means of fulfilling this message? Or would Jacob have stepped up on his own without his mother’s help?  Contemplating free will versus prophecy sometimes makes my mind twist trying to understand how it works.

Friday, 15 February 2008

  • Feed your faith and doubt will starve to death.

     Abraham is thought of as a great patriarch, a leader in the faith.  In Genesis 15:6 (and then quoted in Romans 4:3) it says that "Abram believed the Lord, and he credited it to him as righteousness."  We tend to develop a feeling that this theological leader was an immovable stalwart and never failed. However a closer look at his story shows otherwise.  In chapter 12, Abram heads down to Egypt to escape the famine.  Rather than trust God to provide food and then developing his own plan for protection he introduces Sarai as his sister rather than wife and lets the Pharaoh have her.  God then inflicts a disease upon the Egyptians and Abram is kicked out of the country.  You would think that an episode like this would stick in your mind, but Abram doesn't seem to remember for long as he repeats his mistake 8 chapters later when he lives near King Abimelech.

    It is interesting to note how Abraham denotes safe and unsafe circumstances.  He leaves his home at the command of God then gets lost in the details waiting for the fulfillment of the covenant.  One thing that could be concluded from his failures is that your faith can fluctuate without you falling irretrievably from grace and favor.  Abraham is a predecessor to the Israelite nation in his being and actions as he stumbles, is forgiven, and tries again to please God.  This sad cycle continues into each of our lives and while we should not be proud of it or become so used to it that we ignore it, we can realize that we are not alone in our failings.

Friday, 25 January 2008

  • The Fall

           Later in his section on the Mystery of the Beginning,  Wiesel describes Adam and Eve as blindly following the command God gave them not to eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.  He says that they could not "possibly know what it meant to die, yet they obeyed."  This raises up a few possibilities: either no animals had yet died, the fall came shortly after creation, or Adam and Eve were very unobservant. 

           When the time came and the serpent made his move, he went for Eve.  Did he think her more easy to manipulate?  Was she the main goal or a way to blindside Adam? Well, it seems that Eve was fairly easy to manipulate which brings up a good point about community.  We each need supportive people to back us up and tell us when we're going astray.  Eve didn't have any girlfriends to help her out, but you would think that the only other human could be of use.  Some depictions of this scene assume that Eve was alone when the serpent approached her as she would then be more exposed and easy to deceive.  Gen 3:6 says that after she ate the fruit she "gave some to her husband, who was with her."  The man stood by and watched it happen.  Was this woman's one chance to be in charge and when she failed, men were allowed to dominate for the rest of history?  Is this just a couple learning how to work a marriage?  In any case, in our families and friendships we should support each other and watch out for temptations.  Would history have been changed if Adam had participated in the conversation? We will never know, but this does support Wiesel's summation of Adam's character.  "Adam was a weakling."  Interesting that the man who seems to write from a dominant male perspective and emphasizes all negative aspects of women will slander his own sex in such a manner.  But literature is not intended to be consistent or clear cut.

Thursday, 17 January 2008

  • In the beginning...

     

            Our main text for this course (other than Genesis and Exodus) is Elie Wiesel's Messengers of God. Wiesel is a Jewish author and writes this book from a literary rather than scholarly perspective.  When reading Wiesel's text I am forced to constantly refer to scripture to check what he says.  I read a passage and think, "Wait, did Eve really say that?"  I look it up and realize that , no, it is part of the midrash that was added to fill out the text.  This will take some getting used to. 

            We begin  at the obvious point: creation.  The beginning of time and space.  One thing that I have struggled with in Genesis is how to interpret the first two chapters.  Some days I say that the specifics don't matter as long as I recognize God as sovereign creator.  Other days I am perplexed by questions of timing.  Was everything created in the order stated with distinct separations?  Was each being created directly by God or did he set things in motion and let evolution do the rest?  Unfortunately for my curiosity I can't answer these questions from the bible.  We could debate till we are all blue in the face and wouldn't be closer to having a definite answer.  So I rely on faith and look for another purpose that I can assign to the text.   Mankind is set apart from the other species.  Adam names the animals as God brings them before him.  Giving a name can assert dominance.  They existed before they were named, but without a way to be identified their existence was moot. This process also made the animals mean something to Adam.  He had given them names and in return was filled with a sense of duty towards them.  This accountability is not something that was to be lost in the fall.  Humans still bear responsibility to the other beings that exist on this planet. 

            Also, while Adam was racking his brain for monikers he could assign to every creature in existence he was scrutinizing them for possible companionship.  It can be a creepy thought but it just shows how much better women are than anything else.  Man and woman are made for each other.  There is no substitute.    Austria's Supreme Court would not have had to spend time deciding  that a chimpanzee is not a person if they had realized this (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/austria_chimp).

Wednesday, 09 January 2008

  • I rather doubt anyone still reads this blog as it has been a year since I updated.  But just in case you're listening, things are going to go rather theological for awhile.  I'm taking a class over Genesis and Exodus for which I am required to have a weekly blog. I am to be recording my "thoughts, struggles, insights" from our text. If you like it, please read, and feel free to comment because it could get me some extra credit. 

Top Tags - Weblog

[no tags]

elskamae

  • Visit elskamae's Xanga Site
    • Name: Elsa
    • Gender: Female
    • Member Since: 2/11/2005

About Me

  • I lover my Aussie! I'm slightly sporty (soccer and CC) with a developing love for Ultimate Frizbee. Only recently have I become a computer game nerd. I'm musically inclined but not nearly as talented vocally as my darling Music Major friends.